Honest Comparison
OpenScouter vs Lyssna
Panel-based unmoderated testing (formerly UsabilityHub), $165/mo. Here is how Lyssna compares to OpenScouter on neurodivergent accessibility testing, data capture, and cognitive accessibility evidence.
Feature comparison
| Feature | ★OpenScouter | Lyssna |
|---|---|---|
| Three-stream capture (voice + clicks + facial) | Click + screen recording | |
| Automated facial expression analysis | ||
| Recruited ND research panel | Generalist, US-heavy panel | |
| Cross-tester AI synthesis | AI summaries (Growth+) | |
| Voice transcript capture | Growth plan only | |
| On-demand pricing (no study caps) | 5 studies/mo on Growth | |
| Sentiment timelines | ||
| WCAG 2.2 cognitive mapping | ||
| Consumer Duty / EAA evidence pack | ||
| White-label for agencies |
Lyssna pricing at a glance
- Starting from
- $165/mo (Growth, 5 in-depth studies/mo cap)
- Pricing model
- Flat-rate monthly/annual
- Contract
- Monthly or annual billing. Growth plan capped at 5 in-depth studies per month.
- Panel cost
- ~$1/credit, 1 credit per minute. Moderated: 60+ credits per session.
OpenScouter: on-demand, per-journey pricing. No annual lock-in. No per-seat model. No expiring credits.
Why choose OpenScouter over Lyssna
Lyssna's November 2025 pricing overhaul capped the Growth plan at 5 in-depth studies per month. If you run iterative research, that cap bites fast. OpenScouter has no study caps. You run as many sessions as your project needs.
Lyssna captures clicks and screen recordings but does not offer automated facial expression analysis or sentiment timelines. OpenScouter correlates voice, clicks, and facial reactions in every session, giving your team the full behavioural picture.
Lyssna's panel of 690,000+ testers is heavily US-based and entirely generalist. OpenScouter recruits a dedicated neurodivergent panel across ADHD, dyslexia, autism, and dyspraxia, the 1 in 5 of users your research needs to include.
When Lyssna might be the better fit
For high-volume five-second tests, preference tests, and first-click tests where you need fast quantitative results from a large panel, Lyssna's quick-study tools are hard to beat.
If your research panel needs skew heavily toward US demographics, Lyssna's 690,000+ panelists give you broader reach for that specific market.
We believe in honest comparisons. Lyssna is a respected company, and choosing the right tool depends on your specific needs. If neurodivergent accessibility testing, three-stream behavioural capture, and vulnerable-customer evidence for cognitive accessibility are priorities, OpenScouter is built for exactly that.
More comparisons
Ready to test with real neurodivergent users?
Findings within 2 weeks. No enterprise sales cycle, no long-term commitment.
Ready to see what 1-in-5 of your customers experience?
Try the platform free, or book a demo to see how it works for your team. No credit card required.