behavioural research
Behavioural Research for SaaS Cancellation Flows
Cancellation is where retention metrics and consumer protection law meet. OpenScouter runs remote sessions with neurodivergent participants to find the friction, confusion, and dark patterns that quietly inflate churn and regulatory risk.
The cancel button is a funnel step, and it usually breaks
The funnel step that breaks is rarely the upgrade. It is the offboarding sequence: finding the cancel link in account settings, surviving the retention offer modal, confirming the downgrade, and receiving a clean confirmation email. Each of these screens is a chance to lose trust, attract complaints, and miss the bar set by the UK Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024.
Standard analytics tells you that users abandoned the cancel flow on step three. It does not tell you whether they abandoned because they were confused by a double negative on the confirmation button, or because the retention discount felt manipulative, or because the screen reader announcement was wrong. Click data shows the where. It does not show the why.
Behavioural research closes that gap. By watching real people attempt to cancel, listening to them narrate their reasoning, and reading their facial reactions as they encounter each screen, you can separate genuine save events from coerced ones. That distinction matters commercially and, increasingly, legally.
Our approach
Three behavioural streams on the cancellation journey
We run participants through the full offboarding path: settings discovery, cancel intent, retention offer, confirmation, and post-cancel email. Clicks, rage clicks, and scrolls are captured alongside think-aloud voice and on-device facial expression analysis, so we see hesitation, frustration, and relief in the moments they occur.
Neurodivergent panel as a higher-signal usability sample
Participants with ADHD, autism, dyslexia, and low vision surface confusing copy, ambiguous button hierarchies, and coercive retention patterns that neurotypical testers often push through without noticing. They are not just an accessibility panel. They are a sharper read on whether your cancel flow is genuinely easy.
AI correlation, human-confirmed reports
An AI pipeline aligns the three streams against each step of your cancellation funnel and flags moments where signals diverge from intent. A researcher reviews every finding before delivery. Our reports are evidence for your product and compliance teams, not legal opinion.
The DMCC Act 2024 gives the CMA direct enforcement powers against breaches of consumer protection law and introduces specific reforms to subscription contracts, including pre-contract information, easy cancellation and reminder notices
For SaaS teams running subscription cancellation flows in the UK, this is the headline regulatory development of 2024. The DMCC Act 2024 moves cancellation ease from a UX preference to a consumer protection obligation, with the CMA holding direct enforcement powers rather than relying on court action. For product teams, that shifts the cancel button, the retention offer, and the reminder notice from growth experiments into compliance surface area. Behavioural evidence about how real users, including neurodivergent users, experience each step of the offboarding journey becomes the practical record of whether a flow is easy in fact, not just easy on paper.
What you receive
- Step-by-step behavioural map of your cancellation funnel, from settings entry to confirmation email
- Annotated session clips showing hesitation, rage clicks, and confusion at each retention prompt
- Dark pattern risk register flagging copy, layout, and flow elements that may attract regulatory attention
- Prioritised fix list ranked by behavioural signal strength and likely impact on involuntary churn
- Re-test protocol so product changes to the cancel flow can be validated against the same neurodivergent panel
Frequently asked
- Do you replace our existing tools like Hotjar, Maze, or Dovetail?
- No. OpenScouter is a complement. Hotjar shows you where users drop off in the cancel flow at scale. We tell you why a specific cohort hesitated on the retention modal or misread the confirmation button. Findings are designed to flow into your existing research repository.
- Why neurodivergent participants for a cancellation flow study?
- Cancellation copy is often ambiguous, time-pressured, and emotionally loaded. Participants with ADHD, autism, and dyslexia are more sensitive to that ambiguity, so they expose pattern weaknesses faster. The fixes benefit every user, not only the panel.
- How does this relate to UK subscription law?
- The DMCC Act 2024 introduces specific reforms to subscription contracts in the UK, including easy cancellation and reminder notices, with CMA enforcement powers. Our reports give product teams behavioural evidence about whether a cancel flow is genuinely easy in practice, ahead of and after the relevant provisions coming into force.
- Is the facial expression analysis sent to a cloud service?
- No. Facial expression processing runs locally on the participant's device via on-device computer vision. Only derived signals are correlated with voice and interaction data in the report pipeline.
- How long does a cancellation flow study take?
- From signed brief to human-confirmed report is typically days, not months. Scope depends on how many cancellation paths exist, for example self-serve versus assisted, monthly versus annual, and whether re-test rounds are included.
Keep reading
Research hub
Industry
Use case
Related research
Talk to a behavioural researcher
Tell us about the vertical, the journey, and the evidence you need. We will scope a pilot in days, not weeks.